Menu Content/Inhalt
Home
The Howling Fantods! News since March '97
King of the Ghosts - Pale King Review and Memorial Piece
The Pale King
Saturday, 08 October 2011
Adam Plunkett has written an extensive memorial/review of The Pale King for n+1, King of Ghosts, it's a must read piece:
 
“Turgid,” he wrote to me about the first essay I wrote for him. I hadn’t known the word; it sounded like “rigid” and “turd.” Prolix, he elaborated—abstract, clunky, unclear, obfuscatory, “evincing all the worst qualities of academic writing.” My essay had been written for professors, which was like writing for no audience, or worse. I should ideally write my second essay with an eight-word sentence limit and for an audience of 10-year-olds. Unless I were to change my writing drastically, I’d “spend the rest of my life producing only academic essays,” he wrote, before in green pen he changed “essays” to “prose” and added “middling” before “academic,” to be perfectly clear.
 
 
 
n+1 have collected a number of pieces of writing about DFW:
 
Pale King Updates 8th October
The Pale King
Saturday, 08 October 2011
A couple of recent reviews of The Pale King:
 
 
PopMatters - The Collision of 'Roadside Picnic' and 'Infinite Jest'
Infinite Jest
Thursday, 29 September 2011
Gareth Watkins' article for PopMatters doesn't convince me at all, The Collision of 'Roadside Picnic' and 'Infinite Jest'. Here's a taster:
 
A device exists that can give you what you have always wanted. The basic and most primal need at the heart of who you are can be fulfilled—everything can be good forever. That, or it can destroy all life at its most fundamental level. The device is at the heart of a deadly and forbidden zone, and everyone who has tried to use it has died horribly.

This is, more or less, the plot of a best-seller that Time called one of the 100 best books since 1923, written by a recipient of the MacArthur ‘genius’ grant and one of the most challenging and polarizing novelists of his generation. Or, it is (again more or less) the synopsis of a relatively obscure Russian science-fiction novel which would have sunk in to obscurity had it not been adapted for the screen by a visionary film-maker and served as the inspiration for an acclaimed video game franchise. There are enough similarities between David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest and Boris and Arkaday Strugatsky’s Roadside Picnic that it is a safe bet that the former had read the latter and incorporated it in to his work, but making a crucial change that allows Infinite Jest’s moral and even spiritual message to be better understood.
 
Um...  no? I don't think it's a safe bet. And out of interest I checked the archive and Roadside Picnic isn't in Wallace's library either.
 
Essay - Becoming Yourself: The Afterlife of Reception
Critical Analysis
Wednesday, 28 September 2011
I read Ed Finn's essay, Becoming Yourself: The Afterlife of Reception, last week after it was posted to wallace-l. It's a look at the networks between books and authors that can be mapped based on Amazon recommendations or popular reviews. It is quite an arresting read, especially the research methodology.
 
Patricia Cohen wrote about Finn's essay yesterday on the NYT blog, Arts Beat, Thinking Cap: From David Foster Wallace to Bret Easton Ellis by Way of Faulkner, but I think her piece misses something I found particularly interesting about Wallace's readers. In his essay, Finn writes:
 
In fact on Amazon Wallace’s recommendations almost invariably point browsers to more Wallace texts (including the criticism, reading guides and biographical material on the edge of the circle in Figure 1). This is very unusual.
 
So how unusual is it? Finn compares this to some of Wallace's contemporaries:
 
For comparison, consider a few contemporaries. As of July 2011, Richard Powers’ Gold Bug Variations linked to seven external
novels, including Wallace’s The Pale King (Figure 2). Toni Morrison’s Beloved linked to a very canonical nine external texts (Figure 3). Even Jonathan Franzen, a writer close to Wallace in both his life and literary concerns, linked to four non-Franzen texts in the same July “snapshot” (Figure 4).
 
I'm not surprised that Wallace's readers are just as interested in guides, wider criticism and other books about him (I'm one of those readers myself), but I'm a little more surprised this kind of thing isn't more widespread... Maybe a look at a similar networks related to Pynchon or DeLillo might be enlightening here? 
 
The IJ Liveblog - The Story of O
Infinite Jest
Wednesday, 28 September 2011
There's a new post by Mike over at Words, Words, Words the ongoing liveblog of David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest - The Story of O. (Spoiler warning if you haven't read Infinite Jest)
I love reading the first impressions and experiences of those reading Infinite Jest for the first time. Thanks, Mike.
 
Antwerp Wallace Conference Begins Thursday
Conferences
Tuesday, 20 September 2011
Updates below. 
It's finally here!
The University of Antwerp Conference, Work in Process: Reading David Foster Wallace's The Pale King commences this Thursday.
You can check out the full conference programme, and read abstracts for all of the papers. Some of them sound super-interesting.
The keynote speakers are Marshall Boswell (Understanding David Foster Wallace) and Stephen Burn (David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest: A Reader's Guide). With papers by (to name only a few) Adam Kelly, David Hering and Ryan Blanck.
 
As I've mentioned previously, I wish I could make it... The next best thing would be to have volunteers live blogging and writing summary articles for all the readers here at The Howling Fantods. Keen? Drop me a line if you are going to be there.
 
Update:
From what I've heard so far Day 1 has been a great success. Can't wait to hear more.
Day 2 as well! I've also heard that the conference was recorded...
 
Why There Were Changes to the Wallace Archive
DFW Archive
Wednesday, 21 September 2011
We've run a few pieces recently about some changes to the David Foster Wallace archive at the Harry Ransom Center. After an email conversation with Bonnie Nadell, Wallace's literary agent, I think it's important to clarify what has changed so we can understand the context and reasoning for why these decisions were made.
 
Over to Bonnie Nadell (reproduced with her permission):

Karen and I went to see the archives for the first time in July. In those first months after David died, the Ransom Center had approached us about buying the archives; Karen had to get out of the house where she and David lived in Claremont and in the craziness of grief and the mess of packing up the books into boxes to send to the archives, we made some mistakes. We found out there were books included that David had bought at garage sales or were given to him with writing in them so scholars in the archives might think they were reading David's thoughts/critiques on Mill on the Floss and they were actually some stranger's. Those books got taken out of the library or now have notes on them with an explanation. There were others that had people's cell phone numbers and home addresses that David had written in books so now the personal information is covered over or those pages copied and removed. And yes we did decide to restrict some of the self help books that were pored over and written about on the Awl. As some people have realized, these were really personal comments about family members (written years ago) and are private. Having a person's library with paperback books and writing in them as part of an archive is a new thing really and we did not realize how much personal and private information was in them. For the peace of mind and privacy of David's family these things are now restricted. It's a matter of privacy, to me. These are not public figures, their lives are not meant to be discussed on the internet.
 

Thanks, Bonnie.

 
Footnoting David Foster Wallace
General Updates
Wednesday, 21 September 2011
Omer Rosen and Casey Michael Henry's Huffington Post article, Footnoting David Foster Wallace: Part 1, is an extensive refutation of Maud Newton's recent article about David Foster Wallace [previously, Responses to Maud Newton's DFW Article] as well as the 'flattening' of his work:
 
[...] But let us return to Newton's appropriation of Wallace. Her correlation that Wallace's impresario-as-wandering-dude tone in his non-fiction is responsible for a new kind of online and blogging lethargy -- too many watery qualifiers, e.g. "really really," too-self-consciously conversational intros, e.g. "oh, hi" -- is first made possible through a sequence of intentional flattenings.
 
For example, to present Wallace as a 'stoned slacker' (to use Bill O'Reilly's terminology), at even the linguistic level, is a misreading. One does not craft a 1,100 page tome in the form of an arcane mathematical structure (in this case a Sierpinski Gasket or, as Wallace describes it, a sort of "pyramid on acid") by happenstance.
 
Further, Newton's assumption that Wallace is the sole practitioner of the artful defusion of 'high brow' pretension by 'street slang' is an overstatement -- recall Joyce's exhausting of the entire practice in his "Oxen of the Sun" episode of Ulysses where the whole history of the English language is satirized, equally, from its inception to his contemporary cockney.
 
The overall point missing is how Wallace mastered the art of bridging academic sophistry with the innately human: e.g. combining a Wittgensteinian notion of addiction not existing beyond an addict's ability to articulate it with the more immediate philosophy of gotta-have-nonpresent-drugz-in-an-ever-fuckuppable-intensity. He was, as appears to be the too-obvious definition that seems to cow reviewers by its obviousness, the true crafter of a postmodern 'sincerity' -- a seemingly impossible task in the wake of Pynchon and the psychosexual slapstick of characters like "Oedipa Maas" and "Tyrone Slothrop."

Continue reading Footnoting David Foster Wallace: Part 1.

 
New Material in the David Foster Wallace Archive
DFW Archive
Tuesday, 20 September 2011
There is some new David Foster Wallace material over at the Harry Ransom Center's Archive.
 
 
This collection consists of small amounts of David Foster Wallace-related materials acquired by the Ransom Center from various sources. Included are photocopies of Wallace's completed "usage ballots" for the American Heritage Dictionary; items related to "Democracy and Commerce at the U. S. Open," an article Wallace wrote for Tennis magazine in 1995, including correspondence with Jay Jennings, senior editor at Tennis; a photocopy of a typed letter (1993) from Wallace to Brandon Hobson in which he gives writing advice to the 22-year-old Hobson, comparing and contrasting his own experiences at that age; nine annotated copies of the essay "Host" for the Atlantic Monthly, from a heavily marked early draft to a "final final" draft; a photocopied letter from Wallace to Martha Spaulding of the Atlantic and a brief note from Spaulding explaining the editorial process, along with a "Semi mini style sheet for DFW"; a faxed typescript draft of Infinite Jest; and a first edition, first printing of Review of Contemporary Fiction: Younger Writers Issue, Summer 1993, signed by Wallace and William T. Vollman. The materials are arranged in alphabetical order and date from 1993 to 2006.
 
Further acquisitions of Wallace related materials are expected.
 
 
Spanning nearly thirty years, the Bonnie Nadell Collection of David Foster Wallace documents Nadell's literary representation of Wallace, primarily with personal and professional correspondence between Nadell, Wallace, and publishing insiders. The collection is organized in two series: Series I. Correspondence, and Series II. Agent files. Series I. contains over forty letters (1985-2008) from Wallace to Nadell and about twenty-four email printouts between the two discussing personal and publishing issues. In a 1989 letter, Wallace voices his anticipation of a Nadell visit: ". . . Boston is fun; we'll have laughs, listen to rap and James Brown. . ." In the most recent email (2008), Wallace discusses plans to begin an article for GQ on the just-nominated Barack Obama, stressing his need for "close, candid access to a couple of Obama's junior speech guys" before they become too involved in the campaign. Additional correspondence in Series I. is between Wallace or Nadell and various translators and publishing world colleagues and acquaintances. The content of this correspondence is almost entirely professionally-oriented. In the earliest letter (1985) of the collection, a twenty-three year old Wallace introduces himself and a "representative" chapter of The Broom of the System to Frederick Hill.
 
Series II. contains files relating to Brief Interviews with Hideous Men, The Broom of the System, Consider the Lobster, Everything and More, Girl With Curious Hair, Infinite Jest, Signifying Rappers, and 'periodical publications.' The files mostly contain correspondence between Nadell and editors and publishers, with some Wallace correspondence as well. Interspersed are unmarked, and often undated, typescript copies of various short Wallace pieces that most likely were meant for submission to editors. These typescripts remain in their original locations within the respective folders in which they arrived, perhaps indicating the approximate date Nadell was sending them out. Also present is an essay, "Ralph and the Legal Milestone" (1980), which Wallace wrote for a creative writing class, receiving an A+.
 
The collection remains predominately organized as it arrived at the Ransom Center in 2011, with some minor corrections to the rough chronological order of the correspondence in each folder.
 
[via, Matt King]
 
Artist Karen Green's New Show
General Updates
Monday, 19 September 2011
A Conversation with Artist Karen Green on Her New Show—“Tiny Stampede” & Memory, Grief, and Faith: Max Benavidez Interviews Karen Green on Art and Forgiveness. (15/9/11)
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Currently Reading...

Visit the book store (commission contributes to running this site!)
designed by madeyourweb.com mambo templates