|
The Pale King
|
|
Thursday, 31 December 2009 |
|
Kathleen Fitzpatrick (Hi, Kathleen!) was a member of the DFW panel at MLA09 and posted some news about the session to wallace-l. It sounded like a very interesting session, with some great presenters, hopefully I'll be able to post more about it later. Michael Pietsch was also a panel member and spoke about The Pale King: Kathleen's report revealed:
- DFW had been working on TPK since 1996.
- It's had a number of working titles: "Glitterer," "SJF "(which stood for Sir John Feelgood), and "What is Peoria For?"
- Some of the pieces of short fiction collected elsewhere are chapters of the novel including "The Soul Is Not a Smithy" and "Incarnations of Burned Children." (No clarification if this means they are part of TPK, Nick)
- Wallace did extensive research for the novel in accounting, tax processes, an so forth. (Check out the DFW Research notes at the bottom of the page here)
- There are more than 1000 pages of manuscript, in 150 unique chapters; the novel will be published in time for tax day in April 2011. (With a number of publication date changes already I'd say this is not yet set in stone, Nick)
- The subject of the novel is boredom. The opening of the book instructs the reader to go back and read the small type they skipped on the copyright page, which details the battle with publishers over their determination to call it fiction, when it's all 100% true. The narrator, David Foster Wallace, is at some point confused with another David F. Wallace by IRS computers, pointing to the degree to which our lives are filled with irrelevant complexity.
- The finished book is expected to be more than 400 pages, and will be explicitly subtitled "An Unfinished Novel"; the plan is to make available the drafts and phases the text went through on a website that will exist alongside the book. Pietsch is editing the book in close collaboration with Bonnie Nadell and the estate, but as we've heard him say before, he sees his role very clearly as attempting to order the text into a unified whole, and not making changes that the author isn't there to argue with.
(Thanks for taking such detailed notes, Kathleen! Check out her blog, Planned Obsolescence) | | No comments for this item |
|
Critical Analysis
|
|
Wednesday, 30 December 2009 |
|
Zac Farber contacted me early in December about a short paper he had written about DFW's relationship with his editors. It is an excellent piece of work, and does a great job of bringing together comments by DFW and various people that have edited his work or worked with him. The best thing about this paper is that it draws from numerous articles and interviews that I'd read before but never put together in quite this way. I hope you all enjoy reading it as much as I did. Thanks, Zac. | | No comments for this item |
|
Critical Analysis
|
|
Wednesday, 30 December 2009 |
As promised, here is the second new content item for the thesis page. I enjoyed reading The Road tremendously, so it is a pleasure to host this thesis that considers both it and IJ. I hope you all enjoy reading it. Thanks, Timothy.
Come back tomorrow for Zac Farber's, "‘Neurotic and Obsessive’ but ‘Not too Intansigent or Defensive’: Editing David Foster Wallace." | | No comments for this item |
|
Critical Analysis
|
|
Sunday, 27 December 2009 |
During Infinite Summer earlier this year Chris Hager's Infinite Jest thesis was discussed on the I.S. forums and as a result I got in touch with Chris again. The upshot was that he wrote a new introduction for his thesis, which I then promptly forgot to add to the Fantods! Today's post is the first of three over the next few days that will see new content added to the Thesis section of The Howling Fantods: - Chris Hager's new Thesis Introduction.
- Timothy Henry's undergraduate thesis, "The Language of Landscape, Information, and Disturbance: An Existential Look at the Literary Techniques of David Foster Wallace’sInfinite Jest and Cormac McCarthy’s The Road".
- Zac Farber's, "‘Neurotic and Obsessive’ but ‘Not too Intansigent or Defensive’: Editing David Foster Wallace.
So let's begin with Chris Hager's new introduction for his thesis after the jump.
| | No comments for this item |
|
Read more...
|
|
Conferences
|
|
Thursday, 24 December 2009 |
|
Anyone out there going to this? It looks very interesting. Lee Konstantinou has posted on his blog about the DFW session he helped to organise at the MLA Convention on the 30th of December: [...]I want to put in a plug for the special session I helped organize at the upcoming MLA Convention in Philadelphia. If you're around, please stop by "The Legacy of David Foster Wallace," which is at 8:30 a.m. on Wednesday, December 30th, in Independence Salon I at the Philadelphia Marriott.
We have a distinguished group of panelists including Stephen J. Burn (North Michigan U.), Marshall Boswell (Rhodes C.), Sam Cohen (U. of Missouri, Columbia), John Conley (UMN, Twin Cities), Kathleen Fitzpatrick (Pomona), Mary Holland (SUNY New Paltz), and -- very fortunately -- Wallace's Little, Brown editor, Michael Pietsch. I'll be talking about how Wallace's interpretation of the role of the avant-garde shaped his literary projects. -
Details were posted to wallace-l earlier in the month (thanks, again, Matt), but somehow I missed repeating them here. -
Wednesday, 30 December 612. The Legacy of David Foster Wallace 8:30–9:45 a.m., Independence Salon I, Philadelphia Marriott A special session Presiding: Stephen J. Burn, Northern Michigan Univ. Speakers: Marshall Boswell, Rhodes Coll.; Samuel Cohen, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia; John Conley, Univ. of Minnesota, Twin Cities; Kathleen Fitzpatrick, Pomona Coll.; Mary Holland, State Univ. of New York, New Paltz; Lee Konstantinou, Stanford Univ. Respondent: Michael Pietsch, Little, Brown | | No comments for this item |
|
|
Infinite Jest
|
|
Monday, 10 August 2009 |
A really interesting forum post has popped over at the infinite summer forums which has thrown some light on DFW's response to Chris Hager's IJ thesis hosted here at the fantods.
Chris contacted DFW about the thesis and he replied, "IJ's supposed to have four little projects going at one time, and you totally nailed one and part of a second."
In reponse to this over at the infinite summer forums barone.brian writes (possible Infinite Summer Spoilers below): ---- I just finished the book a few hours ago and have been reeling wildly since. My first thought was to pop over here to see what folks have had to say after reaching the end, which turned out to be a good choice. Over in the thread "Have you finished yet? Because I have and I need to chat!", mitchcalderwood points us to Chris Hager's thesis on IJ, which reportedly comments the importance of the metaphors of the parabola and the tide, of which assertions DFW reportedly said "'IJ's supposed to have four little projects going at one time, and you totally nailed one and part of a second'" (Here I'm quoting mitchcalderwood quoting him (Wallace)).
So, naturally I got to wondering about these alleged "four little projects." In a book as big and all-embracing as IJ, it's hard to think of anything as little, so I sensed little promise in following that lead. What seemed more helpful in tracking down the referent of the "four little projects" statement was concentrating on the word "projects." What if, I thought, with the word "projects" Wallace is referring to motifs or groups of like images or metaphors. In light of the blessing he bestowed on Hager's analysis -- which focuses on two metaphors -- this makes some sort of sense.
After thinking about it a bit and positing what I thought might be the four simultaneous "projects" or motif/metaphor/image groups in IJ, I noticed a pattern that, if even just the tiniest bit true, is mind-blowing in what it reveals about Wallace's all-out awesomeness.
Here goes: The four major motif groups are 1) Consumption/Waste (under which umbrella falls lots of ONAN-related stuff, Hal's roomful's of meat, perhaps all the references to GLAD bags, drug use etc.); 2) Parabolas (lenses, mirrors, tennis lobs, punting, Orin's tumblers, convexity/concavity, AA's 'bottom'); 3) Annular Systems (Annulation, incest, genetics, addiction, one-day-at-a-time, tide, double-triple-quadruple agenting, the choice/freedom double bind even?; 4) Limits and Infinity (Schtitt and the boundaries of the court making the game possible, the - uh - tittle, the Show, mental illness, calculus references all over).
Now, here's the part that really boggled me: the Consumption/Waste idea is a 1:1 correspondence (something in yields something out), what mathematicians call a linear function. The Parabola idea connects, pretty obviously, with parabolas -- now we're looking at x raised to the power of two. Annular Systems are modeled by circles which are given in analytic geometry by equations with both x^2 and y^2. Limits and Infinity, of course, become necessary in order to find the area of shapes under curves like parabolas and three-dimensional projections of circles.
You're probably all sensing how loaded this theory seems to be with connections to DFW's undergraduate work in math, and certainly even the novel itself contains explicit references to math (hello Peemster). Moreover, some evidence -- like DFW's response to Hager's thesis above, or his discussion of "dividing as-if by zero" from the famous Review of Contemporary Fiction interview -- might also point to Wallace's affinity for concepts likes these. I just wonder if an organization this incredibly organic is really at work, or whether I just cooked up something in the excitement of completing this gorgeous, heartbreaking, hilarious, wonderful book that I've imagined wholesale to fit the bill.
Thoughts?
[ barone.brian]--- I think this is pretty interesting and the 4th motif is completely supported by an essay Greg Carlisle ( Elegant Complexity also read his 2009 Liverpool DFW keynote here ) had published in the DFW tribute section of the Sonora Review double issue (55/56) earlier this year. As I posted in the Infinite Summer thread: "Greg's essay, 'Wallace's Inifinite Fiction' considers the role of mathematical limits in the narrative structure of Infinite Jest and examines a number of scenes where the complexity seems to behave like a mathematical limit and never gets resolved (as it approaches infinity). It is pretty awesome and worth getting your hands on." One of the sections of IJ that Greg discusses is the rising action, that never quite makes it to the climax, in Eschaton section. This is one of a number of sections that Greg considers but I don't want to mention any other examples from the essay due to Infinite Summer spoilers. | | No comments for this item |
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|
