|
General Updates
|
|
Thursday, 07 January 2010 |
The second bolano-l group read of 2666 by Roberto Bolaño begins on Jan 25 and (partly because the proposed Infinite Summer read looks dead in the water) you can find out all about it over at Matt Bucher's bolanobolano.com blog. (Matt also maintains bolano-l, wallace-l, and is a good friend. Hi, Matt!) I made it halfway through 2666 during last year's read loving every moment. Unfortunately, life got in the way of finishing the novel, so I am pleased I have a good reason to start over. If you're a wallace-l subscriber there will be plenty of familiar faces participating - join in! | | No comments for this item |
|
The Pale King
|
|
Wednesday, 06 January 2010 |
The Lifted Brow ( previously) just emailed to let me know that the approx 2000 word excerpt from The Pale King in their upcoming issue #6 is titled "A New Examiner" and is about Lane Dean, Jr. The issue will ship in about 3 weeks, having been sent to the printer on Monday. I can't wait for my copy to arrive! (Thanks, R) | | No comments for this item |
|
Articles or Essays by DFW
|
|
Tuesday, 05 January 2010 |
It's entertaining to see DFW's 1998 essay, F/X Porn, being linked to around the web in connection with Avatar discussions. I haven't seen it yet (we've got a new all digital cinema here in Canberra so I guess I'll go see it there in the next couple of weeks) but this line of DFW's from the essay has me wondering just how good it can be... "T2" is thus also the first and best instance of a paradoxical law that appears to hold true for the entire F/X Porn genre. It is called the Inverse Cost and Quality Law, and it states very simply that the larger a movie's budget is, the shittier that movie is going to be. | | No comments for this item |
|
DFW Remembrance
|
|
Tuesday, 05 January 2010 |
|
I woke this morning to an email from the Five Dials team letting me know that the new Five Dials issue is up for download and that the David Foster Wallace Tribute issue is due very soon. You will need to subscribe to their mailing list to receive the special DFW issue. Here's the email:
Here it is: our fiction issue has arrived to brighten your first day back at work now that the woeful comedown of early January has begun. The issue contains new work by James Kelman, Helen Oyeyemi, David Vann, as well as contributions from some up-and-comers like Philip Roth and Rainer Maria Rilke. There's also a list of DJ names, in case your New Year's resolution is to become a DJ. You can download Five Dials 9 for free at: http://www.fivedials.com/fivedials As we like to overload our friends with gifts for New Year’s, you will also be receiving an email in the next few days to let you know where you can download our special issue on David Foster Wallace, featuring writing by Don DeLillo, Jonathan Franzen, Zadie Smith and others. Don’t worry, you won’t have to sign in, or give us your mobile number, or type in a code word. If you know any David Foster Wallace fans who would like to receive a link to the issue please tell them to subscribe to the magazine. It’s free. Questions or comments? Get in touch using this address:
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
Thank you for reading, Craig Taylor | | No comments for this item |
|
Critical Analysis
|
|
Saturday, 02 January 2010 |
Katie Roiphe's Sunday Book Review essay in the New York Times, The Naked and the Conflicted, considers the representations of sex in novels by "Great Male Novelists" with some discussion of DFW and Infinite Jest. (Thanks again, Adam) Update: It's not the only time Roiphe mis- or under-reads Wallace's Updike essay (or Infinite Jest, either). She writes: "In this same essay, Wallace goes on to attack Updike and, in passing, Roth and Mailer for being narcissists. But does this mean that the new generation of novelists is not narcissistic?" Let's return to the Wallace essay Roiphe wants to summarize. Is it true that Wallace fails to note or distinguish the narcissism of a past era versus the narcissism of the present one—such that it's appropriate for a gotcha transition in an overbroad trend piece? No. Just no. | | No comments for this item |
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|